Question Paper from: IBPS RRB PO Mains 2017

The federal court in the Naruto case has merely mirrored the premise that animals can only be objects or properties__________________. Ironically, the imperative of granting legal recognition through legal personality reveals both the obscurity and absurdity of extendin identitis to animals. Even if the courts were to accept limited personhood, we are still left with the reality that the process of recognition is confined to our communities and legal structures. The notion of autonomy and agency of animals will continue to fail. However, the case has pushed us to think over uncharted territories of human/non-human subjectivity in law.
1:
but, rights can be broken down into legal personality of non-human persons
2:
Further, rights can be broken down into formal and substantive rights.
3:
This dispute once again gave rise to questions about the legal personality of non-humans.
4:
but questions regarding the legal standing or legal personality of non-human persons remain unanswered.
5:
And imperative of granting legal communities over uncharted territories.
Solution:
Chapter Name: Single Filler
Difficulty Level: Moderate

This has been asked in Question Paper

IBPS RRB PO Mains 2017

Attempt

More Questions From Paper

prepsutra-app-download android ios

Download the PrepSutra app

Download the app for Android devices and prepare on the go - anytime, anywhere!